Goldman v. Folsom’s Empirical Analysis
246 F.2d 776 · 1957
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently September 1986 · most notably Mullen v. Bowen (1986), Miracle v. Celebrezze (1965)
38 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Ferenz v. Folsom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As part of his answer the Secretary shall file a certified copy of the transcript of the record including the evidence upon which the findings and decision complained of are based. The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing. The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive * *”
30 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`In discharging that duty we must keep in mind, as adjured by the Supreme Court, that”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Our review of the hearing examiner’s findings is limited to ‘ascertaining whether on the record as a whole there is substantial evidence to support the Secretary’s findings of fact’.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.