Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 F.3d 1107 - United States of America v. Devon Julian Bradford

United States of America v. Devon Julian Bradford’s Empirical Analysis

246 F.3d 1107 · 2001

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
November 2010
most recently cited

38 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Kotteakos v. United States · Zafiro v. United States · Gomez v. Dade County School Board · Litwak v. Oscar Productions, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any fact, other than a prior conviction, that `increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum' must be included in the indictment and proven to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “What is clear ... is that in this case the co-defendants joined a unitary conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and there was no appreciable prejudice from the evidence of the Kimble conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the precise sentence determined by the sentencing judge from within the appropriate guidelines range.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.