United States v. Kim’s Empirical Analysis
246 F.3d 186 · 2001
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably United States v. Stewart (2001), United States v. Svoboda (2003)
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pereira v. United States · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co. · United States, v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno · Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc. · United States v. Cabrales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“caused communications to be transmitted into and out of the district”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The amendment was prompted by the failed prosecution of an individual who made a fraudulent telephone call from Mexico to the United States and successfully argued that § 1343 did not cover such a foreign communication. See S.Rep. No. 1873, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 (1956). With this case in mind, Congress acted to “close [the] loophole” that limited prosecution to eases in which the fraudulent transmission occurred between two states, and explicitly extended the coverage of § 1343 to foreign communications. See H.R. Rep. No. 2385, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 (1956), reprinted in 1956 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3091, 3092.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Brennan did not examine venue under the first paragraph of § 3237(a), and its holding does not impact that paragraph_”). 9 . We did not need to answer that question in Brennan because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.