Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 F.3d 822 - King v. Jericol Mining, Inc.

King v. Jericol Mining, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

246 F.3d 822 · 2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · O'KEEFFE v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc. · Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Quarto Mining Co. · Consolidation Coal Co. v. Worrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is apparent to us that, by its plain language, 33 U.S.C. § 922, is a broad reopening provision that is available to employers and employees alike.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.