Kwan v. Schlein’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 412 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 504 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Foman v. Davis · Stewart v. Abend · Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc Ef · City of Sherrill New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[L]itigants have substantial leeway ... to plead alternative, and even inconsistent, claims,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.