Jonas v. Hearnes’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Defendants’ motion for amendment of this Court’s memorandum or in the alternative for instructions seeks clarification of the first above-quoted paragraph, supra p. 71, from the memorandum. It asks the Court to define the term ‘de facto’ as used in that paragraph and ‘whether * * it will be necessary for all members of the House of Representatives and Senate to be elected,’ presumably under the reapportioned districts, before the governor is authorized to call a special session of the General Assembly any time after July 15, 1965.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Paulson v. Meier

2. ““Defendants’ motion is denied for the reason that the Court is not authorized to give advisory opinions and defendants’ motion presents no justiciable issue.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Paulson v. Meier