¶1concurring specially.
¶2I concur specially for the reasons stated in Gates v. State, 244 Ga. 587 (7) (8) (261 SE2d 349) (1979).
246 Ga. 262
271 S.E.2d 172
Decided September 8, 1980
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1980-09-08
Cited by 18 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1992
6 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relies on Gates v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1980-09-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1concurring specially.
¶2I concur specially for the reasons stated in Gates v. State, 244 Ga. 587 (7) (8) (261 SE2d 349) (1979).