Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 ILLAPP3D 261 - Fernandes v. Industrial Commission

Fernandes v. Industrial Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 195 Ill. App. 3d 599 - Dillon v. Industrial Commission · 147 Ill. App. 3d 66 - Deichmiller v. Industrial Commission · 144 Ill. App. 3d 1003 - General Electric Co. v. Industrial Commission · 195 Ill. App. 3d 468 - May v. Industrial Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In looking at section 8(b), sections 8(b)(1) and (b)(2.1) are concerned with calculating and setting minimum rates for temporary total disability and compensation rates for awards under sections 8(c), (d)(2) and (e) of the Act. Section 8(b)(2) covers compensation in all cases other than those covered by sections 8(b)(1) and (b)(2.1); that is, sections 8(d)(1) and 8(f). Section 8(b)(4) establishes the maximum weekly compensation payable under awards referred to in sections 8(b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(2.1). Therefore, as stated in General Electric, we find the maximum rate contained in section 8(b)(4) applies to section 8(d)(1) awards.” Fernandes, 246 Ill. App. 3d at 269 , 615 N.E.2d at 1197 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.