Ward v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2000 · most notably White v. State (1971), Works v. State (1977)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tait v. State · Kallas v. State · Weaver v. State · Warren v. State · Schuble v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ *. . . “Where improper evidence has been admitted over objection and the trial court subsequently withdraws such evidence from the consideration of the jury, it will be presumed that the error has been cured, unless the contrary is made to appear.” . . .’” Ward v. State (1965), 246 Ind. 374, 379 , 205 N. E. 2d 148 , 5 Ind. Dec. 1 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Skaggs v. State““It is well settled that ‘A ruling on a motion for a continuance is reviewable, but only for abuse of discretion clearly shown.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schuty v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.