Rice v. Selking’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““However, when from a search of appellant’s original brief we are unable to learn what specification of the assignment of errors or cause of the motion for new trial they rely upon, there being no mention of this matter whatever in the argument section, we must conclude the requirement of the rule has not been met. The assignment of errors and the motion for new trial may have numerous specifications therein but only the specifications of error presented by the argument section of appellants’ original brief, as required by Rule 2-17 (e), will be considered. Huff et al. v. Ind. State Hwy. Comm. (1958), 238 Ind. 280, 282 , 149 N. E. 2d 299 , 300.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 139 Ind. App. 302 - Glenn v. Thatcher Glass Manufacturing Co.