Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 Ind. 7 - In Re Lee

In Re Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 1987
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. Medberry · Lee v. ALLEN CIRCUIT COURT, SHANNON, JUDGE · Morphew v. State · Speers v. Gladden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * a client is bound by the acts or non-acts of his attorney, whether he be rich or poor, and he can not accept the benefits thereof and reject the undesirable acts or non-acts of his attorney. There are no allegations nor proof that the attorney in this case was incompetent." In Re Lee (1964), 246 Ind. 7 , 198 N.E.2d 231, 232 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.