Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 Kan. 504 - Gregory v. Carey

Gregory v. Carey’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
10
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. Jackson (2003), Smith v. Printup (1993)

2 federal appellate · 10 district · 32 state decisions — followed in 10 states

280199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weingarden v. United States · Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. Scott · McDougald v. Garber · Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. Gafford · Farley v. Engelken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recogniz[ed] that requiring some cognitive awareness as a prerequisite to recovery for loss of enjoyment of life results in the paradoxical situation that the greater the degree of brain injury inflicted by a negligent defendant, the smaller the award the plaintiff can recover.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “took the more realistic approach that, as a general rule, the loss of enjoyment of the pleasurable things in life is inextricably included within the more traditional areas of damages for disability and pain and suffering.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the temptation to achieve a balance between injury and damages has nothing to do with meaningful compensation for the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.