Jones v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1987
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Phil Hollenbach Co. v. Hollenbach · B. F. Avery & Sons v. Carter · Beaver Dam Coal Co. v. Hocker · Rice's Case · Chatfield v. Jellico Coal Mining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The board, or any of its members, shall hear the parties at issue and their representatives and witnesses and shall determine the dispute in a summary manner. The award, together with a statement of the findings of fact, rulings of law and any other matters pertinent to the question at issue, shall be filed with the record of proceedings, and a copy of the award shall immediately be sent to the parties in dispute. (Emphasis added.) Section 4933, Ky. Statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It was delivered to the appellant’s counsel by the third party, which, for the purpose of section 4933, served the purpose of its requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.