Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 Ky. 338 - Hunt v. Crocker

Hunt v. Crocker’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 1957
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 1957

5 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

110193219401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bennett v. Bennett's Admr. · Warden v. Hoover's Administrator · Young's Adm'r v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. · Rieke's Administrator v. Rieke · Moran v. Moran's Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) The court shall grant administration to the relations of the deceased who apply for administration, preferring the surviving husband or wife, and then such others as are next entitled to distribution; or one or more of them whom the court judges will best manage the estate. “(2) If no person mentioned in subsection (1) applies for administration at the second county court from the death of an intestate, the court may grant administration to a creditor, or to any other person, in its discretion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.