Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 Miss. 448 - Hydrick v. State

Hydrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 290 So. 2d 625 - Shanklin v. State (1974), 461 So. 2d 1288 - Johnson v. State (1984)

53 state decisions

180196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 15 Cal. 2d 706 - People v. Snyder · 128 W. Va. 744 - State v. Barker · Simpson v. State · Shields v. State · Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[W]here a specific intent is the gist of the offense charged, the court should not instruct the jury on the presumptions of evidence which apply to the question of intent." 246 Miss. at 452 , 150 So.2d at 425 .”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is rebuttable, and is more properly classified as an inference, even if available in a particular case. It should not be projected in an instruction which fails to disclose its susceptibility to rebuttal, and intimates to the jury that the state has thereby made out its case. Inferences may be drawn properly by the jury from the facts before it, without the trial court invading the jury's province with a direction as to”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"This Court has from time to time reminded the Bench and Bar that when all of the facts are in evidence, an instruction for the State that malice will be implied from the deliberate use of a deadly weapon is not proper." 246 Miss. at 454 , 150 So.2d at 426 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.