Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 Mo. 357 - State v. Baker

State v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1978

17 state decisions

501912192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Duestrow · McClanahan v. West · State v. Baty · State v. Speyer · State v. Deitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We simply reaffirm the salutary rule that want of jurisdiction must be affirmatively shown. It will not be presumed from the mere failure of the record to speak on that subject.”' [State v. Baker, 246 Mo. l. c. 372.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.