Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 N.C. 528 - Cox v. Cox

Cox v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc. (1978), Sink v. Easter (1975)

56 state decisions

200195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Bailey v. McPherson · Story v. . Story · Reece v. Reece · Johnson v. Pilot Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the plaintiff may generally elect to enter a non-suit, ‘to pay the costs and walk out of court,’ in any case in which only his cause of action is to be determined, although it might be an advantage to the defendant to have the action proceed and have the controversy finally settled, he is not allowed to do so when the defendant has set up some ground for affirmative relief or some right or advantage of the defendant has supervened, which he has the right to have settled and concluded in the action. If the defendant sets up a counterclaim arising out of the same transaction alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint, the plaintiff cannot take a nonsuit without the consent of the defendant; but if it is an independent counterclaim, the plaintiff may elect to be non-suited and allow the defendant to proceed with his claim.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]rders and judgments which are not final in their nature, but leave something more to be done with the case, are not immediately reviewable. The remedy is to note an exception at the time, to be considered on appeal from final judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““When a divorce action is instituted, jurisdiction over the custody of the children born of the marriage vests exclusively in the court before whom the divorce action is pending and becomes a concomitant part of the subject matter of the court’s jurisdiction in the divorce action. G.S. 50-13.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.