Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 N.C. 91 - Finch v. Honeycutt

Finch v. Honeycutt’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust Company (1960), Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANY (1963)

39 state decisions

1401957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coddington v. . Stone · Fisher v. . Fisher · McQueen v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. · Efird v. Efird · Burcham v. . Burcham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[i]f a reading of the whole will produces a conviction that the testator must necessarily have intended an interest to be given which is not bequeathed by express or formal words,'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he doctrine of devise or bequest by implication is well established in our law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.