246 N.C. App. 245 - Meadows v. Meadows’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pulliam v. Smith · 169 N.C. App. 423 - In Re PM · 10 N.C. App. 545 - In Re Custody of Stancil · 67 N.C. App. 73 - Dixon v. Dixon · 151 N.C. App. 622 - McConnell v. McConnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]ven assuming, arguendo , that both findings are not supported by competent evidence, it is of no consequence to the instant case. The remaining binding findings of fact, cited above, are sufficient to support the trial court's judgment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any order for custody shall include such terms, including visitation, as will best promote the interest and welfare of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.