Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 N.C. App. 306 - State v. McLaughlin

246 N.C. App. 306 - State v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Davis v. Washington · Dutton v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To qualify as an excited utterance, the statement must relate to '(1) a sufficiently startling experience suspending reflective thought and (2) be a spontaneous reaction, not one resulting from reflection or fabrication.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'the modern trend is to consider whether the delay in making the statement provided an opportunity to manufacture or fabricate the statement.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.