Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 Neb. 547 - Long v. Hacker

Long v. Hacker’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably Tapp v. Blackmore Ranch, Inc. (1998), Barks v. Cosgriff Co. (1995)

80 state decisions

5201994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Central States Resources, Corp. v. First National Bank · Bump v. Firemens Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ · 62 Wash. 2d 351 - Horner v. NORTHERN PAC. ETC. HOSP., INC. · Katskee v. Nevada Bob's Golf of Nebraska, Inc. · Humphrey v. Nebraska Public Power District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plain error exists where there is an error, plainly evident from the record but. not complained of at trial, which prejudicially affects a substantial right of a litigant and is of such a nature that to leave it uncorrected would cause a miscarriage of justice or result in damage to the integrity, reputation, and fairness of the judicial process. Plain error may be asserted for the first time on appeal or be noted by the appellate court on its own motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘means that an employer of an independent contractor ... by assigning work consequent to a duty, is not relieved from liability arising from the delegated duties negligently performed. [Citation omitted.] As a result of a nondelegable duty, the responsibility or ultimate liability for proper performance of a duty cannot be delegated, although actual performance of the task required by a nondelegable duty may be done by another.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.