246 Or. 280
424 P.2d 894
Decided March 15, 1967
Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1967-03-15
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1993
4 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“no way of determining whether the exclusion”
quoted by 2 later decisions, including State v. Luther, State v. Busby
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1967-03-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Defendant appeals from a burglary conviction, contending that the court erred in excluding certain evidence.
¶2 No offer of proof was made and consequently, even *281 if the evidence was admissible, we have no way of determining whether the exclusion of the evidence was prejudicial to defendant.
¶3 The judgment is affirmed.