Call v. Jeremiah’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1995
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barnes v. Chicago M St P Ry Co · Phyfe v. Riley · Lincoln National Bank v. Virgin · Singly v. Warren · Cartwright v. Savage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The crux of the distinction between Kaston and the present case, however, is that in the former case the judgment creditor was not joined as a party defendant in the proceeding to foreclose the prior lien. Here the junior encumbrancer was joined in the suit to foreclose the first mortgage, and having failed to appear, stands in a different position from one who was never given notice and, consequently, never given an opportunity to appear. (Emphasis supplied).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Ulrich v. Lincoln Realty Co., 180 Or. 380 , 168 P.2d 582 , 175 P.2d 149 (1947), clearly establishes that a decree of foreclosure extinguishes a first mortgage and that when the land is redeemed by the mortgagor or his grantee the mortgage is not revived as to any deficiency on the foreclosure sale.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Effect on subordinate lien of redemption by owner or his grantee from sale under prior lien,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.