Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 SO2D 621 - Salas v. State

Salas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2006

21 state decisions

901971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Draper v. United States · Territo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can be qualified by his `experience, skill and independent study of a particular field'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is sufficient if the police officer initiating the chain of communication either had first hand [sic] knowledge or received his information from some person, official source or eye witness, who it seems reasonable to believe is telling the truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “First hand knowledge by an officer is not required; the receipt of information from someone who it seems reasonable to believe is telling the truth is adequate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.