Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 246 SW3D 733 - Dickson v. State

Dickson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 248th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · United States v. Stevens · Rogers v. State · Lane v. State · Burks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order for a court to conclude there is a nexus between an alleged alternative perpetrator and the offense-at-issue, there must be something more than evidence that a person other than the criminal defendant was committing similar crimes around the time of the offense-at-issue, the evidence must connect the alleged alternative perpetrator to the specific offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.