Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

246 Va. 336

437 S.E.2d 411

10 Va.LawRep. 417

Docket Record No. 930044.

Miller v. Commonwealth

James Matthew MILLER, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 5, 1993.

Supreme Court of Virginia · decided 1993-11-05

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2007

7 state decisions

Relies on 15 Va. App. 301 - Miller v. Commonwealth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1993-11-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Upon an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals of Virginia on the 3rd day of November, 1992.

¶2Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel on an appeal limited to the questions whether the trial court erred (1) in admitting evidence of Miller's participation during the spring preceding the commission of the crimes in July in a conversation concerning the means and methods of committing murder without being caught, and (2) in admitting evidence that the firearm Miller used to kill the victim had been stolen eight or nine months before the commission of the crimes, the Court finds no merit in the assignments of error and, for the reasons stated in Miller v. Commonwealth, 15 Va.App. 301, 422 S.E.2d 795 (1992), affirms the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The appellant shall pay to the appellee thirty dollars damages.

¶3CARRICO, C.J., and COMPTON and STEPHENSON, JJ., dissent.

¶4This order shall be published in the Virginia Reports and shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of Virginia and to the Circuit Court of Charles City County.

¶5Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel on an appeal limited to the questions whether the trial court erred (1) in admitting evidence of Miller’s participation during the spring preceding the commission of the crimes in July in a conversation concerning the means and methods of committing murder without being caught, and (2) in admitting evidence that the firearm Miller used to kill the victim had been stolen eight or nine months before the commission of the crimes, the Court finds no merit in the assignments of error and, for the reasons stated in Miller v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 301, 422 S.E.2d. 795 (1992), affirms the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The appellant shall pay to the appellee thirty dollars damages.

CHIEF JUSTICE CARRICO,

¶6JUSTICE COMPTON and JUSTICE STEPHENSON dissent.

¶7This order shall be published in the Virginia Reports and shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of Virginia and to the Circuit Court of Charles City County.

¶8A Copy,

¶9Teste:

¶10[[Image here]]

¶11Is/ David B. Beach, Clerk

/246/va/336 · .json · Public domain