Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 B.R. 677 - In Re Moore

In Re Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329 · 11 U.S.C. § 502

Relies on In Re Hausladen · Williams v. First National Bank, Rosedale, Mississippi (In Re Williams) · General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Judkins (In Re Judkins) · In Re Weissman · In Re Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subdivision, when an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified period by these rules ..., the court for cause shown may at any time in its discretion ... on motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f such objection to a claim is made, the court, after notice and a hearing, shall determine the amount of such claim as of the date of the filing of the petition, and shall allow such claim ... except to the extent that— (9) proof of such claim is not timely filed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]ith all due respect to Judge Steen, this court is unable to find within the clear language of Section 1329(a)(1) even a weak implication that creditors may be added to a plan post-confirmation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.