People v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 8 Cal. 4th 1060 - People v. Rodrigues · 233 Cal. App. 4th 1085 - People v. Rivera · 47 Cal. 4th 725 - Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior Court · 33 Cal. 4th 367 - People v. Carmony · Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van De Kamp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The trial court's decision on a section 1170.18 petition is inherently factual, requiring the trial court to determine whether the defendant meets the statutory criteria for relief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Simms“'the value of the property [Simms] stole disqualifies him from resentencing under [ section 1170.18 ] ... is a factual finding'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Simms“undisputed facts acknowledged by the parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.