People v. Mohamed’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 35 Cal. 3d 547 - People v. Beeman · 47 Cal. 3d 112 - Walker v. Superior Court · People v. Williams · 31 Cal. 4th 518 - People v. Brown · 51 Cal. 3d 72 - People v. Stankewitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'it tend[ed] to connect the defendant with the crime in such a way as to satisfy the jury that the accomplice [was] telling the truth' "].) " ' "The entire conduct of the parties, their relationship, acts, and conduct may be taken into consideration by the trier of fact in determining the sufficiency of the corroboration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Jones“a defendant's own testimony and the reasonable inferences therefrom may supply the necessary corroboration for an accomplice's testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.