Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 CALAPP4TH 56 - Li v. Yan

Li v. Yan’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Couch v. United States · D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co. · 19 Cal. 2d 72 - Hammell v. Britton · 5 Cal. 4th 704 - Schnabel v. Superior Court · 49 Cal. 2d 509 - Webb v. Standard Oil Co. of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a judgment creditor may obtain documents from a judgment debtor either by subpoena duces tecum or by a discovery request for production”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the demand requests information to aid in enforcement of the money judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is in the possession, custody, or control”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.