Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 CALRPTR3D 1 - People v. Johnson

People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Bearden v. Georgia · 41 Cal. 4th 799 - People v. Black · 3 Cal. 3d 100 - In Re Antazo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we are hard pressed to say [the Dueñas ] holding was predictable and should have been anticipated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The idea that [defendant] cannot afford to pay $370 while serving an eight-year prison sentence is unsustainable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “ample time to pay [various fines and fees] from a readily available source of income while incarcerated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.