247 Conn. 914
Decided September 29, 1998
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1998-09-29
Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Provost
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-09-29
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2016
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 56 (AC 15651) is granted, limited to the following issues:
¶2“1. Did the trial court improperly preclude the cross-examination of a prosecution witness?
¶3“2. Was the state’s attorney’s closing argument improper and is it reviewable under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?”