Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.1d 385 - Murphy v. McLoughlin

Murphy v. McLoughlin’s Empirical Analysis

247 F. 385 · 1918

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
December 1965
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Philip Werlein v. City of New Orleans · Fleitas v. Richardson · Fleitas v. Richardson · Handlan v. Walker · Pietri v. McLoughlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, there was no contestation, either in the civil district court or in the Court of Appeal, or in the Supreme Court, as to whether interest was properly allowable or not. It was not a controverted issue between the parties, before the rendition of judgment, and in no true sense can it be said to have been actually litigated in the state court. No mention of the question of interest, other than in the amended judgment of the Court of Appeal, appears in the opinions of the state courts. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.