Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.1d 620 - Ingersoll v. Doyle

Ingersoll v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis

247 F. 620 · 1917

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
April 1968
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1968

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

60191719201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Searchlight Gas Co. v. Prest-O-Lite Co. · Coca-Cola Co. v. Bennett · General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co. · General Electric Co. v. Re-New Lamp Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * They would still be marketing, as Ingersoll watches, watches not such in their entirety, but new constructions. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘Unless the defendants impress upon the dial of any such watch words”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.