Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.1d 664 - Hero v. Hankins

Hero v. Hankins’s Empirical Analysis

247 F. 664 · 1917

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1987

5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

3019171920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brodtman v. Finerty · Cristadoro v. Von Behren's Heirs · Bianchi v. Del Valle · McConnell v. Lemley · Frank v. Suthon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “occasioned by its ruin — i. e., fall or collapse — whether such is due to structural vice or neglect to repair.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * not absolved by the tenant's failure to make the necessary repairs; * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.