Travis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
247 F.2d 130 · 1957
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1990 · most notably Killian v. United States (1962), Travis v. United States (1961)
34 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 50 U.S.C. § 844
Relies on Michelson v. United States · Jencks v. United States · Grunewald v. United States · United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · United States v. Angeline Lombardo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Duplicity’ in an indictment generally means the charging of two or more separate and distinct offenses in one count, not the charging of a single offense into which several related acts enter as ways and means of accomplishing the purpose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.