Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.2d 173 - North Dakota v. Federal Power Commission

North Dakota v. Federal Power Commission’s Empirical Analysis

247 F.2d 173 · 1957

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 1980
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1980

9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1001957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission · United States v. Public Utilities Commission · Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service Commission · De Moss v. United States · State Corp. Commission v. Federal Power Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no commingling of interstate with intrastate gas within the State of North Dakota in the sense of loss of identity because the intrastate gas going to the four North Dakota communities named is separated from the gas stream in the main line and metered before any portion of the gas stream has left the State of North Dakota. Accordingly the quantities of intrastate gas purchased by Montana-Dakota under the `firm gas' [intrastate sales] contracts are easily identifiable and determinable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * does natural gas produced, wholesaled, transported, and sold for immediate consumption solely within the State of North Dakota become a proper subject for federal regulation as being in interstate commerce, because part of its transportation occurs in a commingled state with gas admittedly being transported in interstate commerce * * *?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “natural gas companies engaged in such transportation or sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.