Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.2d 249 - American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, and Central Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Wilson-Keith & Company, a Corporation, and Dumas-Wilson & Company, a Corporation, Wilson-Keith & Company, a Corporation, and Dumas-Wilson & Company, a Corporation v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, and Central Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, and Central Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Wilson-Keith & Company, a Corporation, and Dumas-Wilson & Company, a Corporation, Wilson-Keith & Company, a Corporation, and Dumas-Wilson & Company, a Corporation v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, and Central Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

247 F.2d 249 · 1957

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1993

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

5019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Finn v. American Fire & Casualty Co. · Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. Cashman · Kansas City Stock Yards Co. v. A. Reich & Sons · Packard Manufacturing Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “regardless of the different results in the trials, the function of this court is to review alleged errors and if [a party litigant] had become, in due course, vested with a valid judgment, they are entitled to have the action of the trial court which divested them of it reviewed for the alleged manifest error * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'knowledge' had no technical meaning and meant 'to know'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “understanding intelligent control directed by knowledge;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.