McBride v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis
247 F.2d 595 · 1957
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1997 · most notably 67 Cal. 2d 365 - People v. Lara (1967), Haziel v. United States (1968)
16 federal appellate · 4 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fleming v. Tate · Arthur C. Amos v. The Pullman Company · Williams v. Huff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ojbviously not all minors are capable of making a waiver. Where the court finds for any reason the minor is not capable of waiver the parent may so waive provided the court also finds there is no conflict of interest between them, and of course the waiver by the parent must be an intelligent, knowing act.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“age, education, and information, and all other pertinent facts”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of FDP · In Re JFT
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.