Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.2d 738 - Melvin J. Towers v. James A. Curry, Trustee, Etc.

Melvin J. Towers v. James A. Curry, Trustee, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

247 F.2d 738 · 1957

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1983

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

301957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rauer's Collection Co. v. Higgins · 140 Cal. App. 2d 185 - Strangman v. Duke · Reid v. Englehart-Davidson Mercantile Co. · In Re the Estate of Fath · John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Daniel E. Sanderson, Bankrupt v. Daniel E. Sanderson, Bankrupt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By reason of § 6 of the Bankruptcy Act ( 11 U.S.C.A. § 24 ), we are required to interpret § 1260 of the Civil Code as the California courts have done. While the Civil Code itself provides that the homestead statutes should be liberally construed, and the courts have repeatedly said that is their obligation, it is their liberal construction, and not ours, which must control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There can be no more than one valid declaration of homestead by a claimant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.