Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

247 F.2d 83

Docket No. 13580.

Anthony J. Steinkirchner v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of National Defense

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 10, 1957. Decided June 13, 1957.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-06-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1967

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Pennsylvania Railroad v. Rychlik · McGee v. International Life Insurance · Bantel v. Brownell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Claude L. Dawson, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. Melvin Richter, Atty., dept. of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub and Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Robert Pitofsky, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Certain positions in the Navy Department, including appellant's, were surveyed and downgraded under the Classification Act of 1949, 5 U.S.C.A. 1071. Some employees who were not veterans got new positions at the old level. Appellant, who was a veteran, did not. He appeals, relying on Section 12 of the Veterans Preference Act as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. 861. This section provides for military preference in any 'reduction in personnel'. Since no such reduction occurred, this section does not apply. Cf. Cutting v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 235 F.2d 515, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 883, 77 S.Ct. 99, 1 L.Ed.2d 81; Wagner v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 291, 235 F.2d 518, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 936, 77 S.Ct. 230, 1 L.Ed.2d 165. Cf. Parks v. United States, Ct.Cl., 147 F.Supp. 261.

¶2

Affirmed.

/247/f2d/83 · .json · Public domain