Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.3d 1080 - United States v. Morris

United States v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

247 F.3d 1080 · 2001

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 19 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Price (2001), United States v. Barrett (2007)

33 federal appellate · 19 district · 1 state decisions

510200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Blockburger v. United States · United States v. Lopez · United States v. Dixon · United States v. Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]robable cause does not require facts sufficient for a finding of guilt ..., it does require more than mere suspicion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““[wjhoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.