Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 F.3d 197 - Nish

Nish’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
March 2022
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2022

2 district ·

100200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Russello v. United States · Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. · Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co. · Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]riority in the operation of cafeterias by blind vendors ... shall be afforded when the Secretary determines ... that such operation can be provided at a reasonable cost, with food of a high quality.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the agency determines that the SLA proposal is competitive ... the agency is to consult with DOE. See id. § 395.33(b), (d). If, however, the SLA proposal is determined not to be within the competitive range, the agency may award the contract to the most highly evaluated offeror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he DOE regulations require an SLA's proposal to be within the competitive range or have a reasonable chance of being selected for final award before applying the priority set forth under section 395.33(a)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.