Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

247 F.3d 904

Docket No. 99-17351.

Lyons v. Crawford

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 7, 2000 *

Filed Nov. 13, 2000

Amended April 25, 2001

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2000-11-13

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Kelly v. Small (2002), Peterson v. Lampert (2003)

26 federal appellate · 7 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Lyons v. Crawford

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-11-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Danice Arbor Johnson, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the petitioner-appellant.

¶2Dorothy Nash Holmes, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, Nevada, for the respondent-appellee.

¶3Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6The opinion filed November 13, 2000 [232 F.3d 666], is hereby ordered amended as follows:

Slip Op. at 14430: Delete “AFFIRMED” and add the following new paragraphs to the end of the opinion:
“Nevertheless, because Lyons’s habe-as petition included a number of exhausted claims which the district court dismissed without prejudice at Lyons’s request, we remand this action to the district court to provide Lyons with the opportunity to proceed on such exhausted claims only.

¶7AFFIRMED and REMANDED.”

¶8Except as herein modified, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judge Gould and Judge O’Scannlain have voted to reject the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and Judge Leavy so recommends.

¶9The full court was advised of the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc. A judge of this court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of *905the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration.

¶10The Petition and the Suggestion are thus DENIED.

¶11The mandate shall issue forthwith.

/247/f3d/904 · .json · Public domain