Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 FRD 89 - Stith v. Thorne

Stith v. Thorne’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 2601 (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1679 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1691 (Sherman Antitrust Act)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Barwick v. Celotex Corp. · Valley Acceptance Corp. v. Glasby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “authorize existing licensing authorities . . . to require persons performing escrow, closing or settlement services to comply with certain consumer protection safeguards”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “CRESPA, by its own statutory language, is clear on the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.