Perez v. Rhiddlehoover’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1980
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Leedom v. Kyne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the Complaint in every aspect affords without question sufficient allegations when taken as true will support a finding, and where there has been sufficient participation for adjudication, there would seem to be no denial of due process. Certainly in this instance, with the record that was before the Commission, they could determine whether or not the respondent, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, came within the definition of public utility under the Iowa Code as a matter of law. This they have done. They have further held that the acts of the respondent having been authorized by the Constitution and laws of the United States are outside their regulatory jurisdiction. And if the Commission should determine that this matter is beyond their jurisdiction, the Court has no doubt that there was sufficient admitted matter within the confines of the Complaint to make such a ruling.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) A civil action * * * commenced in a State court against any of the following persons may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: "(1) Any officer of the United States or any agency thereof, or person acting under him, for any act under color of such office * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'No court other than the District Court for the District of Columbia or a court of appeals in any proceeding under section 9 shall have jurisdiction to issue any declaratory judgment pursuant to section 4 or section 5 or any restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction against the execution or enforcement of any provision of this Act or any action of any Federal officer or employee pursuant hereto.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.