Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 FSUPP 751 - Davis v. Boles

Davis v. Boles’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1971
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Hamilton v. Alabama · Lane v. Brown · Cabaniss v. Cunningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Fourth Circuit cases dealing with the denial of counsel on appeal clearly show that once an indigent layman exhibits a desire to appeal, the State becomes duty bound to furnish him with the necessary tools to seek appellate review and that failure to do so is cognizable by Federal Habeas Corpus. See Magee v. Peyton 343 F.2d 433 , 4th Cir. 1965.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.