State v. Dorko’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1996
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1589 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442A
Relies on 143 F. Supp. 445 - State of Oklahoma v. Willingham · 181 F. Supp. 41 - Goldfarb v. Muller · 101 F. Supp. 335 - State of Maryland v. Chapman · 84 Tex. Crim. 402 - Funk v. State · 186 F. Supp. 150 - Galbert v. Shivley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to make scope and course of employment the test for `color of office' is * * * to twist the statute out of its rational construction and go far beyond anything that Congress could possibly have intended in its enactment (of the removal statutes).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“under color of office or in the performance of his duties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.