Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 FSUPP 96 - Sims v. Baggett

Sims v. Baggett’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2011 · most notably Whitcomb v. Chavis (1971), Zimmer v. McKeithen (1973)

23 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

460196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Reynolds v. Sims · Gomillion v. Lightfoot · Civil Rights Cases · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We feel that the District Court in this case acted in a most proper and commendable manner. * * * And it correctly recognized that legislative reapportionment is primarily a matter for legislative consideration and determination, and that judicial relief becomes appropriate only when a legislature fails to reapportion according to federal constitutional requisites in a timely fashion after having had an adequate opportunity to do so.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he Legislature intentionally aggregated predominantly Negro counties with predominantly white counties for the sole purpose of preventing the election of Negroes to House membership.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “. . . designedly or otherwise, a(n) . . . apportionment scheme, under the circumstances of a particular case, would operate to minimize or cancel out the voting strength of racial or political elements of the voting population.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.