Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 247 GA 309 - State v. Royal

State v. Royal’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Commonwealth v. Weiskerger (1989), Bishop v. State (1999)

69 state decisions

3201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · United States v. Russell · Thornton v. State · Merino v. State · Culberson v. Culberson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here a defendant charges that a confidential informant has entrapped him outside the presence of any other witnesses, Roviaro would ordinarily require disclosure of the informant’s identity, since the defense of entrapment would rest upon allegations which only the informant could confirm or deny.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]here exists no ` per se rule that a defendant is entitled to a directed verdict where the informant is not called to rebut the defendant's testimony of entrapment.... (A) defendant's testimony as to entrapment, even if unrebutted by any other witness to the alleged misconduct, will not entitle him to a directed verdict of acquittal unless that unrebutted testimony, together with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom, demands a finding that entrapment occurred.' State v. Royal, 247 Ga. 309, 310 ( 275 SE2d 646 ) (1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “does not magically create a viable defense.' [Cit.] `The proper ruling will depend upon the specific facts and circumstances of each individual case.' [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.